-
Does everything come in twos? Problems with dual-process theories
Dual process theories are everywhere in psychology [zotpressInText item=”{5421944:A45HTJM4}”]. From decision making to emotions, the idea that complex cognitive phenomena can be categorised into two classes with specific common features is very alluring. [zotpressInText item=”{5421944:DT8HLGCV}” format=”%a% (%d%, %p%)”] identified psychologists’ penchant for dichotomies (nature vs nurture etc.) but this dichotomisation began with the cognitive revolution.…
-
Should we retire nominal, ordinal, interval, & ratio levels of measurement?
One of the first things all psychology students are taught is levels of measurement. Every student must wrap their heads around the four different forms data can take: nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio. These are the bedrock of a lot of students’ understanding of measurement, including mine. I didn’t realise there were questions about their…
-
Best reads of 2019
This is a collection of some of the best things I’ve read this year. Organised alphabetically, they cover a wide range of topics. Hopefully you’ll find them as interesting as I did! Comment saying what you really enjoyed reading, I’ll check it out, and may even add it to my list. Culture ‘Most Money Advice…
-
Does calling a study “under powered” help or hinder criticism?
A common criticism of research (past and present) is that it’s “under powered” or “has low power”. What this typically means is the study doesn’t have many participants (typically between 5 and 40) and so has low statistical power for most effect sizes in psychology . But something being “under powered” only makes sense when…